[Patch] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{,c}alloc and omp_{c,re}alloc for Fortran (was: [committed] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{,c}alloc and omp_{c,re}alloc)

2021-09-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 30.09.21 09:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote: This patch adds new OpenMP 5.1 allocator entrypoints ... ... and this patch adds the Fortran support for it, using the C→Fortran converted testcases. Additionally, it fixes and updated the list of API routine names. We now can also tick off one item in t

Re: [Patch] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{,c}alloc and omp_{c,re}alloc for Fortran (was: [committed] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{,c}alloc and omp_{c,re}alloc)

2021-09-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > On 30.09.21 09:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > This patch adds new OpenMP 5.1 allocator entrypoints ... > > ... and this patch adds the Fortran support for it, using the C→Fortran > converted testcases. Additionally, it fixes and upd

Re: [Patch] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{, c}alloc and omp_{c, re}alloc for Fortran (was: [committed] openmp: Add omp_aligned_{,c}alloc and omp_{c,re}alloc)

2021-09-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
Forgot to do a "git add" after modifying three testcases ... This silences the warning for a flag only valid for f951 but not for cc1. Committed the follow-up as r12-3984. Tobias - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellsch

Re: [PATCH, part 2] PR 102458 - issues with simplification of SIZE intrinsic applied to automatic arrays

2021-09-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
Dear Harald, dear all, On 29.09.21 21:20, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: I think I have solved the remaining issue in PR 102458 that prevented the simplification of an expression involving a static initialization and the evaluation of the SIZE of an automatic array which has provable constant

[Patch] Fortran: Various CLASS + assumed-rank fixed [PR102541]

2021-09-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, this patch fixes a bunch of issues with CLASS. * * * Side remark: I disliked the way CLASS is represented when it was introduced; when writing the testcase for this PR and kept fixing the testcase fallout, I started to hate it! I am sure that there are more issues – but I tried hard no