Hi Tobias!
On 2021-09-21T21:22:44+0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> While the previous patch fixed -Wno-missing-include-dirs and sorted
> out some inconsistencies with libcpp warnings, it had two issues:
>
> * Some superfluous warnings were printed, e.g. for
> gfortran nonexisting/file.f90
>t
This patch is adds the missing diagnostic noted in PR fortran/101319.
OK to commit?
-Sandra
commit 9d5b9062d728d1b1bf5acfb914e06d776bdcdb60
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date: Wed Sep 22 07:49:17 2021 -0700
Fortran: diagnostic for argument w/type parameters for assumed-type dummy
202
On 22.09.21 16:58, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
This patch is adds the missing diagnostic noted in PR fortran/101319.
OK to commit?
LGTM. Thanks!
For reference, the F2018 wording is: "If the actual argument is of a
derived type that has type parameters, type-bound procedures, or final
subroutines,
(1) PING**2
(2) However, as it causes for others test-suite fails,* the
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579965.html
[Patch] Fortran: Improve -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings [PR55534]
is probably more important.
[* I don't see it locally as it probably uses
Hi Tobias,
Am 07.09.21 um 16:33 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
Now I actually tested the patch – and fixed some issues.
OK? – It does add support for 'allocated(a[i])' by treating
it as 'allocated(a)', as 'a' must be collectively allocated
("established") on all images of the team.*
'a[i]' is (probabl
Hello,
Do you have interest in wtmoo.com? It will be on sale soon, you can leave
an offer via this email. Please note that no website comes with it, only
the name is on sale.
If you have any questions feel free to ask, we would be happy to hear from
you.
virat smith
Hi Harald,
On 22.09.21 20:29, Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
What I find a bit confusing - from the viewpoint of a user - is the
case of using the preprocessor (-cpp), as one gets e.g.
: Warning: ./no/such/dir: No such file or directory
[-Wmissing-include-dirs]
while without -cpp:
f951:
