Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Skip gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 on targets that don't provide quadmath.h

2021-09-05 Thread H.J. Lu via Fortran
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in > (originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends on the > header file to obtain a typedef for __complex128. It > appears not to be possible to define an equival

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Skip gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 on targets that don't provide quadmath.h

2021-09-05 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote: The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in (originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends on the header file to obtain a typedef for __complex128. It appears not to be p

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Skip gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 on targets that don't provide quadmath.h

2021-09-05 Thread H.J. Lu via Fortran
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore > > wrote: > >> > >> The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in > >> (originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Skip gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 on targets that don't provide quadmath.h

2021-09-05 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 9/5/21 7:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote: The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in (originally written by José Rui Faustino de So