committed – Re: [Patch] testsuite/lib/gfortran.exp: Add -I for ISO*.h [PR101305, PR101660] (was: Re: [Patch] gfortran.dg/dg.exp: Add libgfortran as -I flag for ISO*.h [PR101305] (was: [PATCH 3/3] [PR

2021-08-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
Now committed as obvious as https://gcc.gnu.org/r12-2808-g527a1cf32c27a3fbeaf6be7596241570d864cc4c Follow-up suggestions are welcome. To recap, it changes three things: * In the testcases, update "..." to "<...>" for the include * -I $specpath/libgfortran - to find the .h file in the build dir

Re: [PATCH 3/3] [PR libfortran/101305] Fix ISO_Fortran_binding.h paths in gfortran testsuite

2021-08-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Andreas, On 04.08.21 11:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: On Jul 13 2021, Sandra Loosemore wrote: -#include "../../../libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h" +#include "ISO_Fortran_binding.h" Shouldn't that use since that is an installed header, not one that is supposed to be picked up from the current

Re: [Patch v2 Fortran] Fix c_float128 and c_float128_complex on targets with 128-bit long double.

2021-08-09 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 8/5/21 2:09 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: All PowerPC systems that I'm aware of that use 128-bit floating point use the IBM format. It is anticipated that one or more Linux distributions in the future may move to IEEE 128-bit format, but right now, I'm not aware that any have moved. OK. I n