Hi Sandra,
On 25.07.21 06:11, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Congratulation – we have found a bug in the spec, which is also
present in the current draft (21-007). I have now written to J3:
https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2021-July/013189.html
That discussion seems to have wandered off in
Hi Vivek,
On 24.07.21 16:19, Vivek Rao via Fortran wrote:
The gfortran page https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran says, "Gfortran is the name of
the GNU Fortran project, developing a free Fortran 95/2003/2008 compiler for GCC, the GNU
Compiler Collection." Since Fortran 2018 features are being ad
Hi Sandra,
On 23.07.21 22:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 7/23/21 8:15 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 21.07.21 12:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 13.07.21 23:28, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
ISO_Fortran_binding.h is now generated in the libgfortran build
directory where it is on the default include path.
I have now committed José's patch with the two nits fixed
(cf. my on-top patch to which I just replied)
r12-2511-g0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c
Note:
I have slightly reworded the error message compared to both
the original patch and to my on-top suggestion.
Reason:
When calling a BIN
On 7/26/21 3:45 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
[snip]
I did say that it mostly works because of:
$ find x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/ -name ISO_Fortran_binding.h
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/32/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
And when looking at the -B lines, I
Hi Tobias,
> > This works as expected with Intel and AOCC, but gives a
> > syntax error with every gfortran tested because of match.c:
> >
> > alloc_opt_list:
> >m = gfc_match (" stat = %v", &tmp);
>
> I think we can simply change that one to %e; the definable
> check should ensure that a
In the old days, before F2018, a programmer was required
to explicitly declared a procedure as RECURSIVE if the
programmer wanted a recursive behavior. Fast-forward to
F2018, and J3 has changed the requirements and introduced
a new NON_RECURSIVE prefix; and, by defaults procedures
are considered
