Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types

2021-06-05 Thread dhumieres.dominique--- via Fortran
Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be back ported to at least GCC11. Dominique Le 2021-06-04 17:24, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : Hi José, I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you first posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able

[Patch, Fortran, backport 2 gcc-11] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

2021-06-05 Thread Andre Vehreschild via Fortran
Hi all, I was asked to backport the patch for pr98301 to gcc-11. The patches have been in mainline for two weeks without any defect reports I could fined. The patch for mainline applied with a bit of shift cleanly. Regstested fine on x86_64/f33. Ok for backport gcc-11? Regards, Andre --

Re: [Patch, Fortran, backport 2 gcc-11] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

2021-06-05 Thread Steve Kargl via Fortran
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > > I was asked to backport the patch for pr98301 to gcc-11. The patches have > been in mainline for two weeks without any defect reports I could fined. The > patch for mainline applied with a bit of shift cleanly. > > Regstested