For Your Information ...
Forwarded Message
Subject: GCC 11.0.1 Status Report (2021-03-16)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:19:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Biener
Reply-To: g...@gcc.gnu.org
To: g...@gcc.gnu.org
CC: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
Status
==
GCC trunk which eventually wi
Hi Everybody,
Although this is 'obvious' I thought that I should post it because I
believe that it was triggered by the fix for PR99602 but I just do not have
the bandwidth at the moment to test that. The ChangeLog together with the
patch is more than sufficient explanation.
Regtests OK on FC33/x
Hi Paul,
On 16.03.21 17:42, Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches wrote:
Fortran: Fix runtime errors for class actual arguments [PR99602].
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): For class formal
arguments, use the _data field attributes for runtime errors.
* gfortran.dg/pr99602.f90: New test.
Hi Tobias,
> Shouldn't there be also a testcase which triggers this run-time error?
The testcase is there, it simply has the wrong dg-foo:
! { dg-do compile }
which should be
! { dg-do run }
*-*-*
There are certainly more cases which should insert checks but currently don't,
like:
subrouti
