On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:17 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
>
> >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
> >> NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
> >>> When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
> >>> "ld: warning: -z ignore ignored" and "ld: warning: -z record ignored". I
> >>>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:06 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:29:28 -0400
> NightStrike wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:59 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
> > > NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
> > >
> > > > When
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
"ld: warning: -z ignore ignored" and "ld: warning: -z record ignored". I
can't find those -z options documented anywhere. Why is gfortran adding
them?
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:29:28 -0400
NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:59 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
> > NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
> >
> > > When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
> > > "ld: wa
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:59 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
> NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
>
> > When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
> > "ld: warning: -z ignore ignored" and "ld: warning: -z record ignored". I
> > ca
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 02:34:43 -0400
NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
> When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
> "ld: warning: -z ignore ignored" and "ld: warning: -z record ignored". I
> can't find those -z options documented anywhere. Why is gfortran adding
> the
When linking with -static-libgfortran, I get warnings from ld of the form
"ld: warning: -z ignore ignored" and "ld: warning: -z record ignored". I
can't find those -z options documented anywhere. Why is gfortran adding
them?