> Hi Jakub,
>
> Good catch! Does it fix any specific PR?
>
> If you don't have the time, I would be happy to apply the correction to
> 13-branch through to mainline.
I caught it with my WIP patch to improve tree-ssa-dce. I am not aware
it can produce wrong code. It will likely lead to missed o
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 07:45:32AM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
Honza's catch.
> Good catch! Does it fix any specific PR?
Dunno. I think even without a PR it can be backported after a while.
Jakub
Hi Jakub,
Good catch! Does it fix any specific PR?
If you don't have the time, I would be happy to apply the correction to
13-branch through to mainline.
Regards
Paul
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 22:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:58:26PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > fortra
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 08:58:26PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> fortran produces malloc call with signed size instead of unsigned. This
> in turn makes gimple_call_builtin_p to fail type checking and we do not
> treat the call as malloc call.
>
> regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
>
> gcc/fortran/ChangeL
