On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:23 AM Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> Thanks for the review - I'll act on the points that you raised.
>
> The Linaro people reported a failure in reduce_1.f90 execution, which I
> believe is due to incorrect casting of 'dim' and a wrong specification of its
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the review - I'll act on the points that you raised.
The Linaro people reported a failure in reduce_1.f90 execution, which I
believe is due to incorrect casting of 'dim' and a wrong specification of
its kind. I am waiting to hear back from them as to whether or not I have
fix
Hi Paul,
I took a look at your patch and think I found some improvements needed. In
+bool
+gfc_check_reduce (gfc_expr *array, gfc_expr *operation, gfc_expr *dim,
+ gfc_expr *mask, gfc_expr *identity, gfc_expr *ordered)
+{
...
+ if (formal->sym->attr.allocatable || formal->sym->
On 3/16/25 10:26 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
--- snip ---
A slight niggle is the linker error that comes up if compiled without
any optimization:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: /tmp/cc9cx9Rw.o: requires executable stack
(because the .note.GNU-stack section is executable)
I think that this is unlikely
Hi All,
This version of the REDUCE intrinsic patch has evolved somewhat since the
posting on 2nd March. The most important changes are to the wrapper
function and the addition of two testsuite entries.
The wrapper function now effects:
subroutine wrapper (a, b, c)
type_of_ARRAY, inte
Hi Andre,
Thanks for all these comments, aka early review:
>
> + if (formal->sym->attr.allocatable || formal->sym->attr.allocatable
> + || formal->sym->attr.pointer || formal->sym->attr.pointer
> + || formal->sym->attr.optional || formal->sym->attr.optional
> + || formal->sym->ts
expr->rank = 0;
+ else if (expr->value.function.actual
+ && expr->value.function.actual->expr)
+ expr->rank = expr->value.function.actual->expr->rank - 1;
+}
+#endif
Er?
Typo in Change.Logs
s/discription/description/
That Changel
Hi All,
This is very much an early version of the F2018 REDUCE intrinsic. I am
posting it now because I have totally forgotten how to include new
functions in libgfortran.so. -static-libfortran works fine and the results
are the same as the other brands.
At present, it produces several of link
