Re: [RFC] Change conversion function for unsigned from UINT to UNSIGNED

2024-10-25 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Steve, I'll note that match.cc(gfc_match_type_spec) has to deal with REAL as a possible intrinsic function. See the comment /* REAL is a real pain because it can be a type, intrinsic subprogram, or list item in a type-list of an OpenMP reduction clause. Need to differentiate

Re: [RFC] Change conversion function for unsigned from UINT to UNSIGNED

2024-10-25 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 07:46:28PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Peter Klausler noted in the discussion on github that Sun Fortran, > from which the UNSIGNED proposal was drawn, used UNSIGNED instead > of UINT for conversion of other types to UNSIGNED > (see https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/

Re: [RFC] Change conversion function for unsigned from UINT to UNSIGNED

2024-10-25 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:22:29PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > > I'll note that match.cc(gfc_match_type_spec) has to deal with > > REAL as a possible intrinsic function. See the comment > > > >/* REAL is a real pain because it can be a type, intrinsic subprogram, > > or list item i

[RFC] Change conversion function for unsigned from UINT to UNSIGNED

2024-10-24 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, Peter Klausler noted in the discussion on github that Sun Fortran, from which the UNSIGNED proposal was drawn, used UNSIGNED instead of UINT for conversion of other types to UNSIGNED (see https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/819-5263/aevnb/index.html ). Peter suggested that it would