> On 22 Aug 2021, at 09:44, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 21 Aug 2021, at 23:18, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:53 AM Tobias Burnus
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote
> On 21 Aug 2021, at 23:18, Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:53 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>> On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added uncondi
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:53 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >> libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
> >> even if that is (mostly) harmless since it is a s
> On 20 Aug 2021, at 08:52, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
>>> even if that is (mostly) harmless since it is a sym
On 20.08.21 09:34, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
even if that is (mostly) harmless since it is a symlink to libc.
tested on x86_64, i686-darwin, x86_64-linux,
OK for m
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:10 PM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A while ago had a report of build failure against a Darwin branch on
> the latest OS release. This was because (temporarily) the symlink
> from libm.dylib => libSystem.dylib had been removed/omitted.
>
> libm is not needed on Darwin,
Hi,
A while ago had a report of build failure against a Darwin branch on
the latest OS release. This was because (temporarily) the symlink
from libm.dylib => libSystem.dylib had been removed/omitted.
libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
even if that is (mostly) h