-Andrew
>
> On Monday, October 17, 2022 2:28:33 AM PDT Salvatore Filippone via Fortran
> wrote:
> > Dear all
> > I am getting the following error message, which I find quite confusing
> >
> >68 | use amg_prec_mod
> >
> > | 1
>
Dear all
I am getting the following error message, which I find quite confusing
68 | use amg_prec_mod
| 1
Fatal Error: Mismatch in components of derived type
'__vtype_psb_c_par_mat_mod_Psb_c_par_mat_type' from 'psb_c_par_mat_mod' at
(1): expecting 'bldext', but got 'aclsum'
compil
>>>
>>> I'll keep an eye on the state of the branch. By and large, release
>>> occurs 3-4 months after the start of stage 4. I will leave 2 months maximum.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On
Is there any reason these patches can not be applied and use this test
>> as a test case?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>> On 1/24/22 8:11 AM, Salvatore Filippone via Fortran wrote:
>> > Thanks a lot
>> > (yes, I suspected both gfortran and
; memory).
>
> Your code compiled with gfortran (with Paul's patches in place) shows no
> errors or leaks from valgrind.
>
> So, in summary, in this case I think the current gfortran is missing some
> finalizations (which are fixed by Paul's patches), and ifort is likely
>
And here is the code embedded as text sorry about sending an
attachment that was purged
- testfinal.f90 -
module test_type_mod
type :: my_test_type
integer, allocatable :: i
contains
final :: delete_test_type
end type my_test_t
Hi all
The attached code compiles and runs fine under both GNU and Intel, but it
produces different results, in particular the FINAL subroutine is invoked
just once with GNU, three times with Intel.
It seems to me that they cannot both be right; I am not sure what the
standard is mandating in this
