Re: beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat) gives a signal SIGILL

Hi Paul, - Mensaje original - > De: "Paul Richard Thomas" > Para: "Jerry" > CC: "Jorge D'Elia" , "Gfortran List" > , "Jorge D'Elia" > > Enviado: Sábado, 12 de Agosto 2023 3:56:44 > Asunto: Re: beta gf

Re: beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat) gives a signal SIGILL

Dear Paul / Jerry, - Mensaje original - > De: "Paul Richard Thomas" > Para: "Jerry D" > CC: "Jorge D'Elia" , "Gfortran List" , "Jorge D'Elia" > > Enviado: Viernes, 11 de Agosto 2023 13:55:43 > Asunto: Re: bet

beta gfortran 14.x.y (using -march=native and intrinsic repeat) gives a signal SIGILL

Dear GFortran developers, With the beta gfortran 14.x.y versions we are noticing some runtime errors in a production code. One type of runtime errors is related to the concurrent use of the intrinsic "repeat" when the source code is compiled with the flag -march=native, please, see below: $

A doubt about IMPORT and SELECT TYPE

: "Intel Community" To: "Jorge D'Elia" Sent: Viernes, 2 de Junio 2023 10:28:31 Subject: Re: Bug with IMPORT and SELECT TYPE (Intel Community Subscription Update) Hi jdelia, OP1 (New Contributor II) posted a new reply in Intel® Fortran Compiler on 06-02-2023 10:28

Re: coarrays using extended precision (80 bits) ?

Dear Steve, - Mensaje original - > De: "Gfortran List" org> > Para: "Jorge D'Elia" conicet.gov.ar> > CC: "Gfortran List" org> > Enviado: Viernes, 21 de Abril 2023 19:53:26 > Asunto: Re: coarrays using extended precision (80

coarrays using extended precision (80 bits) ?

Dear GFortran developers, One question: is there any chance of encoding with coarrays using extended precision (80 bits) at least inside a multicore computer? (as if to simplify a bit). To date, the possibility of using double precision (64 bits) or extended precision (80 bits) is an alterna

Re: DGBSV: incorrect numerical results with -L/usr/lib64/atlas ?

Hi Thomas, - Mensaje original - > De: "Thomas Koenig" > Para: "Jorge D'Elia" , "Gfortran List" > CC: "Jorge D'Elia" > Enviado: Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre 2021 3:02:46 > Asunto: Re: DGBSV: incorrect numerical results wi

DGBSV: incorrect numerical results with -L/usr/lib64/atlas ?

Hi all, I do not know if this forum is the most appropriate, but as it based using gfortran I will try to start here. I usually build the ATLAS library in some beta version without any numerical problem that I remember. In a circumstantial way, I have to use the system ATLAS library and, toda

A doubt about lbound and ubound of an array inside a coarray

Hi all, I have a doubt about lbound and bound in the test below using gfortran with opencoarrays, gasnet, and openmpi. With the AA coarray (each AA entry is a 2D array), the values obtained with lbound and ubound are different from the initial and final values arbitrarily defined for each ar