Re: [power-ieee128] What should the math functions be annotated with?

2021-12-03 Thread Bill Schmidt via Fortran
Hi! On 12/3/21 5:56 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Hi Jakub, > >> Note, we want to test both building gcc on ppc64le with older glibc >> and newer glibc (and that libgfortran will have the same ABI between both >> and one can move gcc including libgfortran and libquadmath from the older >> glibc set

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes (work in progress patches)

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Schmidt via Fortran
Would starting from Advance Toolchain 15 with the most recent glibc make things easier for Thomas to test? Thanks, Bill On 10/29/21 4:06 PM, Michael Meissner via Gcc wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:07:38PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I tried this out on the one POWER mac

Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes

2021-11-01 Thread Bill Schmidt via Fortran
Hi Thomas, To me this looks excellent.  If you feel that support for both forms is achievable, that's certainly superior. We had previously been concerned about whether the necessary name mangling support would be possible, but it sounds like you aren't overly worried about that. I'll let Mike

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-15 Thread Bill Schmidt via Fortran
Thanks, Jakub, for starting this discussion, and to everyone who weighed in. The conversation went in a number of different directions, so I'd like to summarize my understanding of points where I think there was agreement. I'd also like to separate out short-term considerations for powerpc64le

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

2021-10-14 Thread Bill Schmidt via Fortran
On 10/5/21 12:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 07:24:31PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Some current Power GCC targets support neither. Some support only >>> double-double. Making IEEE QP float work on th