Hi Yuao,
Yuao Ma wrote:
This time I use git format-patch. Hopefully fix the issue.
Seem so :-)
Do I read you patch correctly that you still want to improve it
before committing the first version? I assume so because the
changelog part of the patch is largely lacking (except for
the summary li
The change looks good to me. Sorry about the breakage.
(For context, after making the return type polymorphic, I was experiment with
removing assumptions that it is even a pointer, but I never actually did that.
The removal of the `= NULL` was just a stray bit of those experiments that
accident
Duly swung! Pushed as r16-3589.
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 17:21, Jerry D wrote:
> On 9/4/25 6:22 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Although PR87362 is marked as fixed, the error becomes rather more
> explicit with
> > this patch, which I actually developed for PR1024
