Re: [Fortran, Patch, Teams, 0/5] Improve on Fortran 2018 teams support

2025-04-13 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Jerry, thank you very much for the review. I would love to fix the nits you found, but I don't see, what you see. Can you elaborate? May be some mail client has removed something, or I am missing something. Are you commenting on > gfc_error ( > "%s argument at %L must be a scalar %s vari

Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001]

2025-04-13 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Jerry, the archive has it here https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-April/062017.html part 4 And part 5 here https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-April/062020.html The mail's order unfortunately got mixed up, but they should all be there. Regards, Andre Andre Vehreschild * ve..

Re: [Fortran, Patch, Team, 3/5] Update get_team, team_number and image_status to F2018 [PR88154, PR88960, PR97210, PR103001]

2025-04-13 Thread Jerry D
On 4/10/25 5:59 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi all, attached patch reworks GET_TEAM(), TEAM_NUMBER() and IMAGE_STATUS() to adhere to the Fortran 2018 as much as possible and to play nicely with the previous patch of the TEAM statements. Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502

2025-04-13 Thread Jerry D
On 4/13/25 1:27 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hi Jerry, The attached patch fixes this bug by adding checks for negative unit numbers in CLOSE and OPEN statements. Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu. OK for trunk OK. Thanks for the patch! Best regards Thomas Pushed as commit ee617380

Re: F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki

2025-04-13 Thread Jerry D
On 4/13/25 12:48 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: Hi All, Recently a lot of work has been done on the "partial" or "no"s in the F2008 and F2018 implementation statuses. Please send me updates and I will do the editing in time for the gcc-15 release. Thanks Paul Andre has a good chunk of th

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR119502

2025-04-13 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Jerry, The attached patch fixes this bug by adding checks for negative unit numbers in CLOSE and OPEN statements. Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu. OK for trunk OK. Thanks for the patch! Best regards Thomas

Re: [patch, Fortran] Fix PR 119669

2025-04-13 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 11.04.25 um 19:15 schrieb Harald Anlauf: There is a duplicate "and and" here: + gfc_error ("Mismatch between subroutine and and " +    "function at %L", &actual->where); OK with this fixed. Ah, yes :-) Thanks for the patch! Commit

F2008 and F2018 statuses on gfortran wiki

2025-04-13 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi All, Recently a lot of work has been done on the "partial" or "no"s in the F2008 and F2018 implementation statuses. Please send me updates and I will do the editing in time for the gcc-15 release. Thanks Paul