Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Hi Thomas, I think this patch produced a regression: FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_26b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_26b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 9) When I revert your patch and test again, above fails do not occur. Could you please i

Re: Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Am 12.03.25 um 18:33 schrieb Thomas Koenig: The test case should stay, but I will remove the dg-error directives. Fix committed as obvious and simple as r15-8006 . Thanks for the heads-up! Best regards Thomas

Re: Regression? Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Hi Andre, FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_26b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 8) FAIL: gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_26b.f90 -O (test for errors, line 9) When I revert your patch and test again, above fails do not occur. Could you please investigate, if I am right? Jep, I missed

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes.

Hi Harald, thanks for the review. Committed with the requested changes (intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV and indexes -> indices in the description) as gcc-15-7997-gbaa9b2b8d2e I haven't added F2023 NOTIFY= image-selector yet, because at the moment I am striving to get F2018 more complete. Thanks