Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes.

Hi Andre! Am 11.03.25 um 17:13 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi all, attached patch adds parsing of TEAM_NUMBER= named arguments in coindexed expressions. The patch also ensures that once in an image_selector_list no more regular coarray indexes are accepted, i.e. coarray[1,2,3, STAT=S, 5] is reje

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct [PR119199]

Hi Thomas! Am 11.03.25 um 07:13 schrieb Thomas Koenig: Hi Harald, Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline? Looks good to me. Thanks for the patch! Committed as r15-7966-g5e9f71254a5276. Thanks for the review! Best regards Thomas

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR107143, v1] Fix gimplification error in forall' pointer remapping

Hi Harald, I try to explain why I think my patch although solving the issue for this case, does not do so in every case: My patch lets dependency analysis figure that the two objects can not have any dependencies on each other or memory they are pointing to when the types are different. Lets assu

Re: [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Interest in 2025 GSoC – Fortran DO CONCURRENT Auto-Parallelization

On 3/10/25 4:29 AM, Damian Rouson wrote: If this moves forward, I’d like to offer example code to target in Fiats (https://go.lbl.gov/fiats ).  I presented automatic parallelization results produced by compiling with LLVM flang- new for inference at the PAW-ATM worksho

Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15

On 3/10/25 1:08 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi Steve and Jerry, thanks for the review and the proposed changes. I have based on them, but needed to adapt some places, because the meaning was changed. Can you please take another look? Jerry, where do I find this check-script? In bin/ nothing ju

Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15

On 3/10/25 9:57 AM, Jerry D wrote: On 3/10/25 1:08 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi Steve and Jerry, thanks for the review and the proposed changes. I have based on them, but needed to adapt some places, because the meaning was changed. Can you please take another look? Jerry, where do I find

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Am 11.03.25 um 10:22 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi Thomas, looks good to me as well. Thanks for the patch. Committed as r15-7964. Thanks Harald and Andre! Best regards Thomas

[Fortran, Patch, PR98903, v1] Add parsing and code gen for TEAM_NUMBER in coindexes.

Hi all, attached patch adds parsing of TEAM_NUMBER= named arguments in coindexed expressions. The patch also ensures that once in an image_selector_list no more regular coarray indexes are accepted, i.e. coarray[1,2,3, STAT=S, 5] is rejected, because the 5 must not come after any of (STAT, TEAM, T

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject SAVE of a COMMON in a BLOCK construct [PR119199]

Hi Harald, Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for mainline? Looks good to me. Thanks for the patch! Best regards Thomas

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Hi Thomas, looks good to me as well. Thanks for the patch. Regards, Andre On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 07:11:53 +0100 Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 10.03.25 um 22:34 schrieb Harald Anlauf: > > > the patch looks basically fine but I cannot find the testcase. > > You're right, here it is. > > Best re

Re: [Ping, Patch, www-docs, Fortran, Coarray-ABI] Announce coarray-ABI changes in gfortran-15

Hi Jerry, thanks for the review. Committed as 87c7db8b1b2c1484d6de3331098669735d33f95e. I also had it checked using the W3C validator w/o any errors. Therefore committed. Thanks again, Andre On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:01:46 -0700 Jerry D wrote: > On 3/10/25 9:57 AM, Jerry D wrote: > > On

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 119078, putting a procedure in an abstract interface into global namespace

Am 10.03.25 um 22:34 schrieb Harald Anlauf: the patch looks basically fine but I cannot find the testcase. You're right, here it is. Best regards Thomas diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc index 20bf6e127ff..ef9c80147cc 100644 --- a/gcc/fortra

Fwd: [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Interest in 2025 GSoC – Fortran DO CONCURRENT Auto-Parallelization

-- Forwarded message - From: Zhang lv Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [GSoC][Fortran – DO CONCURRENT] Interest in 2025 GSoC – Fortran DO CONCURRENT Auto-Parallelization To: Damian Rouson Hi Damian and GFortran community, Thanks for sharing insights on the evalua