Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR107143, v1] Fix gimplification error in forall' pointer remapping

2025-03-07 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Andre, Am 06.03.25 um 09:15 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi Harald, I try to explain why I think my patch although solving the issue for this case, does not do so in every case: My patch lets dependency analysis figure that the two objects can not have any dependencies on each other or memory

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix check for non-optional arrays passed to elemental

2025-03-07 Thread Jerry D
On 2/28/25 1:13 AM, Peter Hill wrote: No problem, created PR119054 with a reproducer and some details. Cheers, Peter Peter, thanks very much for the patch. It is fixed on gcc-15 and will do back ports in a few days. Best Regards Jerry PS If you are interested you can join our MatterMost

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: improve checking of substring bounds [PR119118]

2025-03-07 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Steve, Am 06.03.25 um 22:32 schrieb Steve Kargl: On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:04:08PM +0100, Harald Anlauf wrote: this patch fixes an interesting regression that prevented substring bounds checks from being generated if the substring start was not a variable, but rather a constant or an expre

[committed] testsuite: Add test for already fixed PR [PR104826]

2025-03-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! ICE on this test was fixed by r15-2131. This just adds test for it. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious. 2025-03-06 Jakub Jelinek PR fortran/104826 * gfortran.dg/gomp/pr104826.f90: New test. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/