Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of component ref to assumed-rank dummy [PR118683]

On 1/28/25 12:49 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, the attached simple and obvious patch fixes an issue found when running a UBSAN instrumented compiler on a recent testcase, see PR.  Also verified when running f951 under gdb on that testcase. I intend to commit within the next 24 hours unless

Re: [patch, libfortran] PR114618 Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

On 1/28/25 1:33 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Jerry, while I haven't read your actual patch yet, I think the testcase is slightly incorrect. In fact, Intel, NAG, Nvidia and AMD flang disagree with it. I also installed flang and noticed this. I also received a auto patch test on ARM that causes me

Re: [patch, libfortran] PR114618 Format produces incorrect output when contains 1x, ok when uses " "

Jerry, while I haven't read your actual patch yet, I think the testcase is slightly incorrect. In fact, Intel, NAG, Nvidia and AMD flang disagree with it. Adding the following lines before the check with the STOP statement: write(*,'(a)') output1 write(*,'(a)') output2 write (*, fmt1) 'RADIX',

[PATCH] Fortran: fix passing of component ref to assumed-rank dummy [PR118683]

Dear all, the attached simple and obvious patch fixes an issue found when running a UBSAN instrumented compiler on a recent testcase, see PR. Also verified when running f951 under gdb on that testcase. I intend to commit within the next 24 hours unless there are comments. Regtested on x86_64-p

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105542: 12 regressions on arm

On 1/28/25 10:40 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:32 AM Jerry D wrote: Before I go clicking on links, is this legit? I presume patches are getting checked before being pushed. Yes this is a legit email from the Linaro automation. And yes patches are being tested before th

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105542: 12 regressions on arm

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:32 AM Jerry D wrote: > > > Before I go clicking on links, is this legit? I presume patches are > getting checked before being pushed. Yes this is a legit email from the Linaro automation. And yes patches are being tested before they get pushed to help developers just in

Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105542: 12 regressions on arm

Before I go clicking on links, is this legit? I presume patches are getting checked before being pushed. I do not have an arm based machine to test on. Regards, Jerry Forwarded Message Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #105542: 12 regressions on arm Date: Tue, 28 Jan 20

Re: [PATCH] [OpenACC] Add tests for implied copy of variables in reduction clause.

Hi! On 2023-12-20T14:48:29+, Abid Qadeer wrote: > From: Hafiz Abid Qadeer > > The OpenACC reduction clause on compute construct implies a copy clause > for each reduction variable [1]. This patch adds tests to check if the > implied copy is being generated. The check covers various types and