On 1/26/25 2:07 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear all,
in the checking of imported interfaces we need to use the local names
of procedures that are renamed-on-use, as the original name becomes
inaccessible. Similarly, we should not compare interfaces of
non-bind(C) procedures against bind(C) interf
Hi Sandra,
this patch LGTM with some minor comments. Or rather:
I have a few minor comments that should be fixed right away
and a few larger items for which PRs should be filed.
See below.
Sandra Loosemore wrote:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
PR middle-end/112779
PR middle-end/113904
This was seemingly forgotten when UNROLL/TILE was added.
Committed asr15-7220-g7cd133a6e4b042 as obvious. Tobias
commit 7cd133a6e4b04262620489dbf4b4e3ae5e96c95f
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mon Jan 27 00:35:17 2025 +0100
Fortran: In openmp.cc, uncomment unroll/tile lines of gfc_omp_directi
Dear all,
in the checking of imported interfaces we need to use the local names
of procedures that are renamed-on-use, as the original name becomes
inaccessible. Similarly, we should not compare interfaces of
non-bind(C) procedures against bind(C) interfaces that are not
explicitly made accessib
Hi,
John Campbell wrote:
Would it be easier to consider "DO CONCURRENT with LOCAL / LOCAL_INIT" as a
special case of !$OMP PARALLEL DO, so utilise this existing implementation ?
I think I want to handle by default a bare 'do concurrent' with a code
separate from OpenMP, but using the normal
Would it be easier to consider "DO CONCURRENT with LOCAL / LOCAL_INIT" as a
special case of !$OMP PARALLEL DO, so utilise this existing implementation ?
John Campbell
-Original Message-
From: Damian Rouson
Sent: Sunday, 26 January 2025 9:38 AM
To: Tobias Burnus
Cc: Jerry D ; Andre Veh
