On 1/6/25 2:08 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi all,
attached patch has been rebased to latest trunk. Just pinging!
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
- Andre
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:10:58 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi all,
attached patch fixes deep-copying (or r
On 1/6/25 6:21 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi all,
during looking for something completely different, I figured, that gcc does not
use std::set internally, but its implementation of hash_set. I therefore
adapted the patch to use it. Nothing more changed.
Still regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gn
On 1/6/25 2:06 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi all,
pinging attached rebased patch.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
- Andre
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:50:13 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi all,
attached patch improves analysis of cycles in derived types, i.e. type
Hi all,
during looking for something completely different, I figured, that gcc does not
use std::set internally, but its implementation of hash_set. I therefore
adapted the patch to use it. Nothing more changed.
Still regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
An
Hi all,
attached patch has been rebased to latest trunk. Just pinging!
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
- Andre
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:10:58 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached patch fixes deep-copying (or rather its former absence) for
> allocatabl
Hi all,
pinging attached rebased patch.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
- Andre
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:50:13 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached patch improves analysis of cycles in derived types, i.e. type
> dependencies ala:
>
> type(T)
> type(