On 12/30/24 12:34 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi Jerry,
With such an illustrious group of contributors, I can hardly say 'no',
can I? :-)
It looks fine to me - OK for trunk.
Regards
Paul
Thanks Paul. Special thanks to Steve for taking this on.
commit efc0981077a70c4de4596f682c4aeade0
Hi PA,
Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
Folded everything in one patch. […]
Updated ChangeLog. […]
Thanks.
Rebased and amended accordingly. I believe I did the right thing but
please have a quick look to be sure.
...
Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks!
LGTM :-)
For libgomp.fortran/dispatch-3.f90, see just
Hi PA,
Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
On 27/12/2024 19:52, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
Running adjust-args-10.f90 manually exhibited a bug that no other
testcase triggered. So I fixed the bug; then moved adjust-args-10.f90
to the libgomp testsuite, renamed it to dispatch-3.f90 and made it
dg-run.
I
On 27/12/2024 19:52, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
On 23/12/2024 21:04, Tobias Burnus wrote:
For adjust-args-10.f90, I wonder whether it is sufficient as compile-
time only or whether it makes more sense to have a "dg-do run" to
check that type(C_ptr) value vs. not-value works. I think either is
f
Hi Jerry,
With such an illustrious group of contributors, I can hardly say 'no', can
I? :-)
It looks fine to me - OK for trunk.
Regards
Paul
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 at 23:10, Jerry D wrote:
> Attached is the revised patch incorporating handling of optional
> arguments of a calling procedure and
