Hi PA,
Paul-Antoine Arras wrote:
See the revised patch attached and my comments below.
First, for Fortran patches, please also CC fortran@ besides gcc-patches@.
The original patch email can be found at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671763.html
I have not looked in
Hi Andre,
Am 16.12.24 um 15:26 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi Harald,
thanks for finding the bug so quickly. I took another look and came up with the
attached trivially looking patch, which replaces the old version 1 entirely.
The new v2 version of the patch just makes use of existing code gues
Hi Harald,
thanks for finding the bug so quickly. I took another look and came up with the
attached trivially looking patch, which replaces the old version 1 entirely.
The new v2 version of the patch just makes use of existing code guessing the
type of the associate variable, which once I found i
This is a big deal, Andre! Thanks for working on this patch. I have some
test code that I can dig up if that’s helpful. Have you tested with nested
derived type components, i.e., allocatable components that are themselves
derived types that have allocatable components?
The need for this featur
PING!
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 19:10:08 +0100
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had to dive deeply into the issue with handling allocatable components in
> derived types and to find a future proof solution. I hope do have found a
> universal and flexible one now:
>
> For each allocatable (or po
