On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 10:05:49PM +, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the attached patch fixes an ICE when passing an inquiry reference of a complex
> array to an assumed-rank dummy argument by terminating the search for the
> array reference before we hit the inquiry reference. (The arr
Dear all,
the attached patch fixes an ICE when passing an inquiry reference of a complex
array to an assumed-rank dummy argument by terminating the search for the
array reference before we hit the inquiry reference. (The array reference
is needed for a possible descriptor update w.r.t. bounds.)
Jerry D writes:
> On 11/25/24 3:09 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> The breakage was caused by the patch for PR109345. As it happens,
>> this part of the patch was not required to fix the PR and looked to
>> be a considerable simplification of the condition. Although correct
>> that a
On 11/25/24 3:09 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
The breakage was caused by the patch for PR109345. As it happens, this
part of the patch was not required to fix the PR and looked to be a
considerable simplification of the condition. Although correct that all
is left are class dummies,
Thanks Paul, got it.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, 3:13 AM Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> OK by me.
>
> A small nit: s/too/to/ in the ChangeLog.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 02:50, Jerry D wrote:
>
>> I would like to commit t
Hi Paul,
commit r15-4610-gbf43fe6aa966ea initially added it,
commit r15-5603-gb3f1b9e2aa079f removed it last Friday,
so something might have got intermixed.
I think you should remove it. If unsure, ask the authors
of the above commits.
Cheers,
Harald
Am 25.11.24 um 12:25 schrieb Paul Richard
Hi Harald,
The pull said that the rebase was successful. Where that #define came from
is a mystery to me. What do I do with it?
Cheers
Paul
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 at 21:26, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Am 24.11.24 um 17:40 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
> > Fixed as 'obvious' on 13-branch to mainline w
Hi Jerry,
OK by me.
A small nit: s/too/to/ in the ChangeLog.
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 02:50, Jerry D wrote:
> I would like to commit the attached patch for Steve.
>
> Regression tested on x86-64-linux-gnu.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Author: Steve Kargl
> Date: Sun Nov
Hi All,
The breakage was caused by the patch for PR109345. As it happens, this part
of the patch was not required to fix the PR and looked to be a considerable
simplification of the condition. Although correct that all is left are
class dummies, it caused the regression by not checking that it is
