Hi Harald,
Yes indeed about proc_ptr_56.f90 :-( That was a slip that occurred in the
preparation of the patch for the list. I will indeed make proc_ptr_54.f90
compile-only for the time being. The latter was not elided from my platform
for any level of optimization for the simple reason that system
PR fortran/117442 reports a crash on exit of f951 when configured
with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats.
The crash happens if any diagnostics were ever buffered into
error_buffer. The root cause is that error_buffer is statically
allocated and thus has a non-trivial destructor called at exit.
I
Hi Folks.
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 19:23, Harald Anlauf wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Am 05.11.24 um 16:24 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> There is not much to say about the attached patch other than it is minimal
>> :-) The testcases are probably a bit more than is strictly needed since th
Hi Paul,
Am 05.11.24 um 16:24 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
Hi All,
There is not much to say about the attached patch other than it is minimal
:-) The testcases are probably a bit more than is strictly needed since the
interface tests (proc_ptr_55.f90) are already tested elsewhere. However, it
i
Hi All,
There is not much to say about the attached patch other than it is minimal
:-) The testcases are probably a bit more than is strictly needed since the
interface tests (proc_ptr_55.f90) are already tested elsewhere. However, it
is as well to check in this context.
OK for mainline and 14-br
