[patch, Fortran] Introduce unsigned versions of MASKL and MASKR

Hello world, MASKR and MASKL are obvious candidates for unsigned, too; in the previous version of the doc patch, I had promised that these would take unsigned arguments in the future. What I had in mind was they could take an unsigned argument and return an unsigned result. Thinking about this a

[Patch, fortran] [13-15 regressions] PR115070 & 115348

Pushed as 'obvious' in commit r15-4702. This patch has been on my tree since July so I thought to get it out of the way before it died of bit-rot. Will backport in a week. Fortran: Fix regressions with intent(out) class[PR115070, PR115348]. 2024-10-27 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran PR fortran/115070

Re: [pushed] doc, fortran: Add a missing menu item.

> On 27 Oct 2024, at 08:08, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Am 27.10.24 um 00:15 schrieb Iain Sandoe: >> Tested on x86_64-darwin21 and linux, with makeinfo 6.7 pushed to trunk, >> thanks > For the record, makeinfo 6.8 did not show this as an error. Hmm that’s maybe a regression in texinfo 6.8 then,

Re: [pushed] doc, fortran: Add a missing menu item.

Am 27.10.24 um 00:15 schrieb Iain Sandoe: Tested on x86_64-darwin21 and linux, with makeinfo 6.7 pushed to trunk, thanks Thanks! For the record, makeinfo 6.8 did not show this as an error. Best regards Thomas