As Jerry wrote (thanks!), this was missing the attached patch.
Best regards
Thomasdiff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
index 829ab00c665..e5ffe67 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
@@ -2788,7 +2788,7 @@ As of now, the
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 11:02:42AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> While I understand the intent of 'positive form' vs 'negative form', the
> above might be clearer as
>
>Usage of intrinsics can be implemented either by generating a call
>to the libgfortran library function or by directly g
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:27:07PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> >
> > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * invoke.texi(finline-intrinsics): Document new flag.
> > * lang.opt (finline-intrinsics, finline-intrinsics=,
> > fno-inline-intrinsics): New flags.
> > * options.cc (gfc_post_opt
Hello world,
this implements SUM and PRODUCT for UNSIGNED. This is actually
missing from 24-116.txt, but that is due to an oversight.
This patch is on top of
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-September/060975.html
and uses the same method suggested by Richard: Use unsigned for the
dat
