Hi Paul,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how
do we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
I think your suggestion of -std=f202y is good, we can then make
-funsigned depend on that.
Hmm... one thing. I just read
https://wg5-fortran.org/N2201-N2250/N223
On 9/10/24 12:49 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how
do we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
I very much suppory this idea and would like to see Thomas and Pauls
patches go in under this option so we do not
The use -std=f202y seems like a reasonable approach to
wall off experimental implementations of proposed changes
to the Fortran standard. Thomas has introduced -funsigned
for this purpose, which I suppose can be thought of a more
fine-grained wall.
BTW, J3 passed 24-136r1.txt, which is marked a
Hi All,
This correspondence touches on something that I was going to raise - how do
we incorporate experimental F202Y features?
The reason that I ask is that Reinhold Bader proposed extensions to the
processing of assumed rank objects, which became a DIN proposal to WG5 -
see attached. It made so
