Hi Thomas!
On 2024-07-29T10:18:49+0200, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
> for the fortran-unsigned branch
By the way: I did see your recent announcement; wow -- Fortran finally
getting an UNSIGNED type! :-)
> I would like to be able to run all
> existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to mak
Hi Andrew,
Any other possibilites?
Yes you could add it into the list of Torture options that
gfortran-dg-runtest uses.
Something like:
```
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gfortran-dg.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gfortran-dg.exp
index fcba95dc396..0589d507382 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gfortran-d
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 1:20 AM Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all
> existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option
> does not break anything on existing code.
>
> Question is: How?
>
> I came as far as
>
> $ m
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 10:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:20, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all
> > existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option
> > does not break a
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 09:20, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all
> existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option
> does not break anything on existing code.
>
> Question is: How?
>
> I came as far as
>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:53:47AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Andre, hi all,
>
> Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > yes, I could have looked harder 🙂
>
> I wrote ;-) on purpose as this feature is somewhat hidden and writing 'dg-do
> compile' doesn't harm.
I think an explicit dg-do is better, oth
Hi,
for the fortran-unsigned branch, I would like to be able to run all
existing Fortran tests also with -funsigned, to make sure the option
does not break anything on existing code.
Question is: How?
I came as far as
$ make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-funsigned"
but that
Hi Andre, hi all,
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
yes, I could have looked harder 🙂
I wrote ;-) on purpose as this feature is somewhat hidden and writing
'dg-do compile' doesn't harm.
In case of gcc/testsuite, the 'run' is also needed and were often missed
(or rather caused by invalid variants su
Thanks a lot Tobias,
yes, I could have looked harder :-)
This isn't by any chance documented on the developer website of gcc somewhere?
It would be sad, if that knowledge is not publicy available for the future.
Thanks again for the explanation and keep up the good work.
Regards,
Andre
Hi Andre,
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
I am wondering why the testcase has no `!{ dg-do ... }` line. What will dejagnu
do then? Sorry for the may be stupid question, but I never encountered a
testcase without a dg-do line. It was the minimum for me.
Well, then you need look harder ;-)
In gcc/test
Hi Tobias,
I am wondering why the testcase has no `!{ dg-do ... }` line. What will dejagnu
do then? Sorry for the may be stupid question, but I never encountered a
testcase without a dg-do line. It was the minimum for me.
Besides that the patch looks ok to me.
- Andre
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:34
11 matches
Mail list logo
