Hi Thomas,
Welcome back!
I was going to propose that we introduce -std=f2028 and to allow proposed
features to be run only if that option is selected; ie. not by default or
-std=gnu. gfortran.dg should have an f2028 directory as well.
I have already written and tested a patch for Reinhold Bader'
Hi everybody,
now that a proposal for unsigned number inclusion in Fortran has
passed the J3 hurdle, https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/24/24-116.txt ,
I thought I would put my working hours where my mouth is and try
my hand at a testbed implementation for gfortran. I am still
grateful to Reinhold
From: Mikael Morin
Hello,
this fixes a null pointer dereference with absent optional dummy passed
as BACK argument of MINLOC/MAXLOC.
Tested for regression on x86_64-linux.
OK for master?
-- >8 --
Protect the evaluation of BACK with a check that the reference is non-null
in case the expression
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes this by avoiding looking for and avoiding the
EOF condition in the parent READ after returning from the child IO process.
I could not think of a simple test case yet since the problem occurred
only when redirecting the input to the test program via a pipe. If
Hi all, hi Paul,
you asked me to have a look at PR85510 (which the associate meta bug is blocked
by). I have come up with the cause. The symbol of the coarray is deemed to be
host_associated and therefore the caf_token is not created in the correct scope.
I am not familiar with host-association, s
Hi Paul,
thanks for the review. I have added a stripped down version of the initial
submission as testcase pr88624.f90 (for compile only) and commited as:
gcc-15-2190-g913bab282d9
Thanks for the review and regards,
Andre
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 17:16:20 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>
