Hi Paul,
isn't the ref you are computing here:
+ /* Mark so that rhs "used unallocated" warnings can be issued.
Component
+references do not generate the warnings. */
+ for (ref = expr1->ref; ref; ref = ref->next)
+ if (ref->type == REF_COMPONENT)
+ break;
not
Hi All,
This patch is simple and well described by the ChangeLogs and the comments.
Regtests OK.
OK for mainline and backporting?
Cheers
Paul
Change.Logs
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
index ed1213a41cb..c1fb896f587 100644
--- a/gcc/fortr
Hi Andre,
It looks good to me. I am happy to see that the principle of the patch has
Richi's blessing too.
OK for mainline. I leave it for you (and Richi?) to decide whether to
backport in time for the 14.2 release.
Regards
Paul
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 14:08, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi al
Hi all,
attached patch fixes an ICE in coarray code, where the coarray expression
already was a pointer, which confused the compiler. Furthermore have I removed
a rewrite to a caf_send late in the trans-phase. This is now done in the
resolve stage to have only a single place for these rewriting ac
Hi all,
and the last ping.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:05:09 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the attached patch fixes a segfault in the compiler, where for pointer
> components of a derived type th
Hi all,
and another ping...
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
- Andre
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:42:54 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached patch fixes using of coarrays as dummy arguments. The coarray
> dummy argument was not dereferenced correctly
Hi all,
pinging for attached patch rebased on master and my patch for 78466.
Anyone in for a review?
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:51:53 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the patch attached fixes the
Hi all,
just pinging on this patch. The attached patch is rebased to an unmodified
master as of this afternoon (CEST 3 p.m.).
Anyone in for a review?
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 11:17:44 +0200
Andre Vehreschild wr