> This part of the patch is quite old, but from the remaining log it looks I
> got an error here:
> Now on a second thought, this did not require a fix perhaps. We can drop it.
I have addressed this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/656484.html
The test should now be run on al
Pushed after testing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
The macro may not be present in all libc's, but the built-in is always
available.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/656409.html for context.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/ieee/signaling_2.f90: Adjust test.
Hi Andre,
Am 03.07.24 um 12:58 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
Hi Harald,
I am sorry for the long delay, but fixing the negative stride lead from one
issue to the next. I finally got a version that does not regress. Please have a
look.
This patch has two parts:
1. The runtime library part in pr9699