Re: [pushed] readings: Drop FORTRAN 77 test suite at itl.nist.gov

On 6/18/24 10:20 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:13:23AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: The original subsite has disappeared and we couldn't find it elsewhere. https://github.com/gklimowicz/FCVS gklimowicz is a flang developer and member of J3. FWIW my copy of the tests st

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Andre, Am 19.06.24 um 09:07 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: Hi Harald, thank you for the investigation and useful tips. I had to figure what went wrong here, but I now figured, that the array needs repacking when a negative stride is used (or at least a call to that routine, which then fixes "stu

Re: [Patch, Fortran, 90076] 1/3 Fix Polymorphic Allocate on Assignment Memory Leak

Hi Paul, thanks for the review. Committed as: gcc-15-1434-gdbb718175d7 Please take a look at the other two merge request or tell me that you have no time, then I ping them to hopefully get some one else to take a look. Thanks again for the review. Regards, Andre On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 06:

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix for CHARACTER(len=*) dummies with bind(C) [PR115390]

Hi Harald, that patch looks quite obvious to me. Therefore ok for mainline by me. Thanks for the patch. Regards, Andre On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:10:55 +0200 Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear all, > > the attached simple patch fixes warnings for use of uninitialized > temporaries for the string

Re: [Fortran, Patch, PR 96992] Fix Class arrays of different ranks are rejected as storage association argument

Hi Harald, thank you for the investigation and useful tips. I had to figure what went wrong here, but I now figured, that the array needs repacking when a negative stride is used (or at least a call to that routine, which then fixes "stuff"). I have added it, freeing the memory allocated potential