Hi Paul,
this looks good to me and is OK for mainline. When it has survived a
week or two, backporting at least to 14-branch (ideally before 14.2
release) would be a good thing!
Regarding the following excerpt of the testcase:
+! Commented out lines give implicit type warnings with gfortran an
Hi Andre,
the patch looks fairly simple and obvious, so OK from my side.
***
Regarding the testsuite: since you renamed one of the testcases
gfortran.dg/coarray_alloc_comp_* and moved it to gfortran.dg/coarray/,
I checked and noticed that there are other similar runtime tests for
coarrays (whil
Hi all,
I somehow got assigned to this PR so I fixed it. GFortran was ICEing because of
the ASSUME_RANK in a derived to class conversion. After fixing this, storage
association was producing segfaults. The "shape conversion" of the class array
as dummy argument was not initializing the dim 0 strid
Hi Andre,
Thanks - I will wait for Harald, if for no other reason than I just don't
have time today to do the commit :-)
BTW Note the commented out lines in the testcase. They fail in the front
end for reasons that I am not sure are correct. Interestingly, nagfor does
the same. Ifort fails on man
Hi Paul,
to me this looks fine. Thanks for the patch. Me having been away for some time
from gfortran, I recommend you wait for Harald's ok, too.
Regards,
Andre
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:43:03 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Both,
>
> Thanks for the highly constructive comments. I t
Hi all,
I messed up renaming of the coarray_alloc_comp-test. This is fixed in the second
version of the patch. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Additionally I figured that this patch also fixed PR fortran/103112.
Regtests ok on x86_64 Fedora 39. Ok for mainline?
Regards,
Andre
On Tue, 11 J
