Hi Harald,
Thanks for the loophole detection! It is obvious now I see it, as is the
fix. I'll get on to it as soon as I find some time.
Cheers
Paul
On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 at 21:35, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> your approach sounds entirely reasonable.
>
> But as the following addition to
Hi Paul,
your approach sounds entirely reasonable.
But as the following addition to the testcase shows, there seem to
be loopholes left.
When I add the following to function f:
integer :: l1(size(y))
integer :: l2(size(z))
print *, size (l1), size (l2), size (z)
I g
Hi All,
I have extended the testcase - see below and have
s/dependent_decls_2/dependent_decls_2.f90/ in the ChnageLog.
Cheers
Paul
! { dg-do run }
!
! Fix for PR59104 in which the dependence on the old style function result
! was not taken into account in the ordering of auto array allocation a
Hi FX,
Thank you so much for your prompt response.
Glad to know Gfortran is free. I really appreciate that you have shared the
link with me. I will take a look.
All the best,
Zhenjin
From: FX Coudert
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 4:07 AM
To: Zhenjin Zhu
Cc: Fort
> I am interested in your company's Fortran Compiler.
> Is it free? If not, how much for a permanent license?
gfortran is free, part of GCC which is open source software. It is provided on
your system:
- for Windows see there: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
- for macOS, as part of
