Hi Andre,
I apologise for the slow response. It's been something of a heavy week...
This is good for mainline.
Thanks
Paul
PS That's good news about the funding. Maybe we will get to see "built in"
coarrays soon?
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 11:25, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached
Andre,
I have not seen an answer to your email. I just built gcc/gfortran with
a build directory named objx/. My 'make -j6 check-fortran' completed
without issues (other than the usual broken libsaniziter tests and
confusion of gmake versus make and $MAKE). From your description, it
would certa
Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 6/6/24 06:06, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+@item I/O within OpenMP target regions and OpenACC compute regions
is supported
+ using the C library @code{printf} functions.
+ Additionally, the Fortran @code{print}/@code{write}
statements are
+ supported within O
On 6/6/24 06:06, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Thomas,
regarding the commit r15-1070-g3a4775d4403f2e /
https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-1070
First, thanks for adding I/O support to nvptx offloading.
I have a wording nit, to be confirmed by a native speaker:
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.texi
+++ b/libgomp/libgom
Hi!
On 2023-01-20T22:16:00+0100, Hi wrote:
> On 2023-01-20T22:04:02+0100, I wrote:
>> We've been (t)asked to enable (portions of) GCC/Fortran I/O for nvptx
>> offloading, which means building a normal (non-'LIBGFOR_MINIMAL')
>> configuration of libgfortran.
>
> This is achieved by 'nvptx, libgfort
Hi Thomas,
regarding the commit r15-1070-g3a4775d4403f2e / https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-1070
First, thanks for adding I/O support to nvptx offloading.
I have a wording nit, to be confirmed by a native speaker:
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.texi
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.texi
...
+@item I/O within OpenMP tar
Hi!
On 2023-01-20T22:04:02+0100, I wrote:
> We've been (t)asked to enable (portions of) GCC/Fortran I/O for nvptx
> offloading, which means building a normal (non-'LIBGFOR_MINIMAL')
> configuration of libgfortran. One prerequisite patch, based on WIP work
> by Andrew Stubbs, is: "nvptx, libgcc: S
