Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

On 5/6/24 23:35, Toon Moene wrote: On 5/6/24 23:32, Andrew Pinski wrote: Did you test x86_64 with -march=native (or with -mfma) or just -O3? The reason why I am asking is aarch64 includes FMA by default while x86_64 does not. Most recent x86_64 includes an FMA instruction but since the base IS

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

On 5/6/24 23:32, Andrew Pinski wrote: Did you test x86_64 with -march=native (or with -mfma) or just -O3? The reason why I am asking is aarch64 includes FMA by default while x86_64 does not. Most recent x86_64 includes an FMA instruction but since the base ISA does not include it, it is not enab

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:27 PM Toon Moene wrote: > > I have now, for some time, ran LAPACK's test programs on my gcc/gfortran > builds on both on the x86_64-linux-gnu architecture, as well as the > aarch64-linux-gnu one (see, e.g., > http://moene.org/~toon/lapack-amd64-gfortran13-O3). > > The resu

Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

I have now, for some time, ran LAPACK's test programs on my gcc/gfortran builds on both on the x86_64-linux-gnu architecture, as well as the aarch64-linux-gnu one (see, e.g., http://moene.org/~toon/lapack-amd64-gfortran13-O3). The results are rather alarming - this is r15-202 for aarch64 vs r1

[PATCH] Fortran: improve attribute conflict checking [PR93635]

Dear all, I've been contemplating whether to submit the attached patch. It addresses an ICE-on-invalid as reported in the PR, and also fixes an accepts-invalid (see testcase), plus maybe some more, related due to incomplete checking of symbol attribute conflicts. The fix does not fully address th

Re: [PATCH, libgfortran] aix: Fix building fat library for AIX

> libgfortran/ChangeLog: > * config/t-aix (all-local, libcaf_single): Explicitly reference > caf/.libs/single.o OK, and sorry for the breakage. FX

[PATCH, libgfortran] aix: Fix building fat library for AIX

aix: Fix building fat library for AIX With the change in subdirectories, the code for libgfortran fat libraries needs to be adjusted to explicitly reference the subdirectory. AIX creates fat library archives and the compiler itself can be built as either 32 bit or 64 bit appli

Re: [PATCH] libgfortran: Fix libgfortran.so versioning on Solaris with subdirs

Hi FX, >> This patch fixes this by allowing for the new structure. >> Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11. >> >> Ok for trunk? > > OK to push, given it’s localised inside LIBGFOR_USE_SYMVER_SUN. > > I find it weird though that .libs is harcoded there. If we look at all the > l