Re: [Patch, fortran] PR103471 - [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

2024-04-19 Thread Harald Anlauf
Hi Paul, the patch is OK, but I had to manually fix it. I wonder how you managed to produce: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93484.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr93484.f90 new file mode 100644 index 000..4dcad47e8da --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr103471.f90

[Patch, fortran] PR103471 - [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

2024-04-19 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi All, This is a more or less obvious patch. The action is in resolve.cc. The chunk in symbol.cc is a tidy up of a diagnostic marker to distinguish where the 'no IMPLICIT type' error was coming from and the chunk in trans-decl.cc follows from discussion with Harald on the PR. Regtests fine. OK f

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-04-19 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 07:06, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > Am 18.04.24 um 01:27 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > > We also should make sure that all generated files (either in git or in > > the release/snapshot tar balls) can be reliably and reproducibly > > regenerated. This also helps the (pre-commi