On 3/6/24 9:13 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry,
can you please replace the user message in e.g. your new testcase
pr105456-wf.f90 by say:
piomsg="The users message containing % and %% and %s and other stuff"
This behaves as expected with Intel, but dies horribly with gfortran
after your patc
On 3/6/24 9:13 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
"The users message containing % and %% and %s and other stuff"
I see what you mean. our standard error messages are expecting values in
these places and since none are there, fault.
Should we simply output "The users message containing % and %% and %s
On 3/6/24 9:13 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry,
can you please replace the user message in e.g. your new testcase
pr105456-wf.f90 by say:
piomsg="The users message containing % and %% and %s and other stuff"
This behaves as expected with Intel, but dies horribly with gfortran
after your patc
Hi Jerry,
can you please replace the user message in e.g. your new testcase
pr105456-wf.f90 by say:
piomsg="The users message containing % and %% and %s and other stuff"
This behaves as expected with Intel, but dies horribly with gfortran
after your patch!
Cheers,
Harald
On 3/6/24 05:06, Jer
Hi Paul,
thanks for reviewing the patch, and your trust in me :-)
Backporting to 13-branch seems easily feasible (needs another small
queued backport on which this patch depends), but going further is
definitely out of the question... Will wait a couple of weeks though.
Harald
On 3/6/24 11:51
Hi Harald,
This all looks good to me. OK for mainline and, according to intestinal
fortitude on your part, earlier branches.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 21:24, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> error recovery on arithmetic errors during simplification has bugged
> me for a long time
