Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > > > - If I get this right, to take one example, the Fortran front-end will emit > > a call to gfortran_acospi_r4(), libgfortran provides this as a wrapper > > calling acospif(), which is called either from libm or from libgfortra

Re: GSoc Topics

Thanks, I'll check them out. On Wed, 24 Jan, 2024, 03:52 Martin Jambor, wrote: > Hello, > > We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has > applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations > have not been announced yet. > > On Fri, Jan 12 2024, Gaurang

Re: GSoc Topics

Hello, We are delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. GCC has applied to be part of GSoC 2024 but of course selected organizations have not been announced yet. On Fri, Jan 12 2024, Gaurang Aswal via Gcc wrote: > Hey I am Gaurang Aswal a 4th year B.E. Computer Science student from BI

[PATCH] Fortran: passing of optional dummies to elemental procedures [PR113377]

Dear all, here's the second part of a series for the treatment of missing optional arguments passed to optional dummies, now fixing the case that the latter procedures are elemental. Adjustments were necessary when the missing dummy has the VALUE attribute. I factored the code for the treatment

Re: [PATCH] openmp, fortran: Add Fortran support for indirect clause on the declare target directive

Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote: This patch adds support for the indirect clause on the OpenMP 'declare target' directive in Fortran. As with the C and C++ front-ends, this applies the 'omp declare target indirect' attribute on affected function declarations. The C test cases have also been translated

Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:09 AM FX Coudert wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > Hello, long time no see. Time is short and we're all busy with life, but it is nice to see familiar names! > > > Thanks for the patch. I’ll take time to d

Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:40:27AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:08:43AM +0100, FX Coudert wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > Thanks for the patch. I’ll take time to do a proper review, but > > after a first read I had the following questions: > > > > - "an OS's libm may/will c

Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:08:43AM +0100, FX Coudert wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the patch. I’ll take time to do a proper review, but > after a first read I had the following questions: > > - "an OS's libm may/will contain cospi(), etc.”: do those functions > conform to any standard? Are th

Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:09 AM FX Coudert wrote: > > Hi Steve, Hello, long time no see. > Thanks for the patch. I’ll take time to do a proper review, but after a first > read I had the following questions: > > - "an OS's libm may/will contain cospi(), etc.”: do those functions conform > to a

Re: [Fortran] half-cycle trig functions and atan[d] fixes

Hi Steve, Thanks for the patch. I’ll take time to do a proper review, but after a first read I had the following questions: - "an OS's libm may/will contain cospi(), etc.”: do those functions conform to any standard? Are there plans to implement them outside FreeBSD at this point? - On systems