On 1/10/2024 7:52 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 05/01/2024 01:43, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to fix the bug when HAVE_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD is
not defined in dec_waiting_unlocked function. As io.h does
not include async.h, the WRLOCK and RWUNLOCK macros are
undefined.
libgfortran/ChangeLog
Dear all,
we are accepting loop annotations IVDEP, UNROLL n, VECTOR, and NOVECTOR
for ordinary do loops, but ICE when such an annotation is specified
before a DO CONCURRENT loop.
Since at least the Intel compilers recognize some of the annotations
also for DO CONCURRENT, it seems natural to exten
Julian Brown wrote:
This patch adds support for parsing general lvalues ("locator list item
types") for OpenMP "map", "to" and "from" clauses to the C front-end,
similar to the previously-posted patch for C++. Such syntax is permitted
for OpenMP 5.0 and above. It was previously posted for mainl
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:14:41 +0100
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:23:26PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> > * g++.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-10.C: New test.
>
> This test FAILs in C++23/C++26 modes, just try
> make check-g++ GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
Op wo 10 jan 2024 om 11:54 schreef abhay dutta :
>
>
On 05/01/2024 01:43, Lipeng Zhu wrote:
This patch try to fix the bug when HAVE_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD is
not defined in dec_waiting_unlocked function. As io.h does
not include async.h, the WRLOCK and RWUNLOCK macros are
undefined.
libgfortran/ChangeLog:
* io/io.h (dec_waiting_unlocked): Use
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:23:26PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> * g++.dg/gomp/bad-array-section-10.C: New test.
This test FAILs in C++23/C++26 modes, just try
make check-g++ GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26
RUNTESTFLAGS=gomp.exp=bad-array-section-10.C
While in C++20 comma in ar
