[PATCH] Fortran: diagnostics of MODULE PROCEDURE declaration conflicts [PR104649]

Dear all, the attached patch improves the diagnostics of MODULE PROCEDURE declaration conflicts, when one of the declarations is an alternate return. We used to ICE before. Steve identified the cause of the issue and provided a partial fix. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? T

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR104625 ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

Hi Paul, this looks all good to me. It is great that you added the handling of nested parentheses to the resolution, as that appears to be needed also in other situations. Thanks for the patch! Harald On 10/26/23 19:14, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: Hi All, The attached patch fixes the origina

[Patch, fortran] PR104625 ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

Hi All, The attached patch fixes the original problem, in which parentheses around the selector in select type constructs caused ICES. Stacked parentheses caused problems in trans-stmt.cc. Rather than tracking this down, the redundant parentheses were removed on resolution of the selector expressi

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Missed that, sorry. Please move the test to gfortran.dg/gomp/ — those tests are automatically compiled with -fopenmp, hence, no need for dg-(additional-)options. Not applicable here, but tests that use omp.h or "use omp_lib" or the runtime have to be under libgomp/testsuite - or, for compile ch

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Hi PA! On 2023-10-26T18:28:07+0200, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote: > On 26/10/2023 18:16, you wrote: >> On 2023-10-26T13:24:04+0200, Paul-Antoine Arras >> wrote: >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_20.f90 >>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ >>> +! { dg-do compile } >>> +! { dg-additio

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Hi Thomas, On 26/10/2023 18:16, you wrote: Hi! On 2023-10-26T13:24:04+0200, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote: --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_20.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! { dg-additional-options "-fopenmp" } +[...] --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfor

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Hi! On 2023-10-26T13:24:04+0200, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_20.f90 > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ > +! { dg-do compile } > +! { dg-additional-options "-fopenmp" } > +[...] > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_21.f90 > @@ -

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Hi Paul-Antoine, On 26.10.23 13:24, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote: Please see the updated patch attached incorporating your input and details below. ... Is this latest revision ready to commit? LGTM. Thanks, Tobias - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfs

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix incompatible types between INTEGER(8) and TYPE(c_ptr)

Hi Tobias, Please see the updated patch attached incorporating your input and details below. On 24/10/2023 18:12, you wrote: On 20.10.23 16:02, Paul-Antoine Arras wrote: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:   * interface.cc (gfc_compare_types): Return true in this situation. That's a bad descriptio

Re: [PATCH, OpenACC 2.7, v2] readonly modifier support in front-ends

Hi! On 2023-08-07T21:58:27+0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > here's the updated v2 of the readonly modifier front-end patch. Thanks. +++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.cc @@ -14059,7 +14059,8 @@ c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *parser, static tree c_parser_omp_var_list_parens (