On 10/11/23 12:44 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
sorry for attaching the wrong patch - this time it is the correct one!
Harald
On 10/11/23 21:39, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
the attached trivial patch fixes (= catches) a forgotten corner-case
in the detection of a name conflict betwee
On 10/11/23 12:39 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
the attached trivial patch fixes (= catches) a forgotten corner-case
in the detection of a name conflict between an internal procedure and
a local declaration for the case that the latter is a derived type.
Another torture test by Gerhard... ;
On 13.10.23 13:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
@@ -1400,23 +1400,53 @@ gimplify_bind_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p)
+ else if (errorcount
+ || (align == NULL_TREE
+
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> * parse.cc (check_omp_allocate_stmt): Permit procedure pointers
> here (rejected later) for less mislreading diagnostic.
s/misl/mis/
> libgomp/ChangeLog:
>
> * libgomp.texi:
Fill in something here.
> @@ -7220,8
Hi Richard,
I take the non-compliances to be bugs and so I think that there is value in
posting the table on the meta-bug PR. Once the table is on its way to be
published, I will replace it on the PR with a table containing the partial-
and non-compliances only or raise specific PRs. For the F2018
On 13.10.23 08:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:54 PM Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
I have posted the version 4 of Ian Chivers and Jane Sleightholme's F2008
compliance table as an attachment to PR39627.
...
I am halfway through the F2018 table and will post it on PR85836 whe