Re: [PATCH 00/14] fortran: Use precalculated class container for deallocation [PR110618]

2023-07-17 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 15/07/2023 à 08:11, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : Please either remove or uncomment the line: // gcc_assert (se.pre.head == NULL_TREE && se.post.head == NULL_TREE); I presume that it reflects some case where the assertion failed? If so, it might be prudent to retain the assertion especially

Re: PR82943 - Suggested patch to fix

2023-07-17 Thread Alexander Westbrooks via Fortran
Hello, I wanted to follow up on this, and ask what the next steps would be to incorporate this patch? Thanks, Alexander Westbrooks On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:38 PM Alexander Westbrooks wrote: > Hello, > > I have finished my testing, and updated my patch and relevant Changelogs. > I added 4 n

[committed] OpenMP/Fortran: Parsing support for 'uses_allocators'

2023-07-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Committed the attached patch as r14-2582-g89d0f082b3c95f. This is about OpenMP's uses_allocators clause to the 'target' directive. Using the clause with predefined allocators as list arguments is required if those allocators are used in a target region - unless there is an 'omp requires dynamic_