Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-28 Thread Jerry D via Fortran
On 5/28/23 12:25 PM, Mikael Morin wrote: Hello, I would like to apply for 60% of my work time if there is funding for it. These are the projects that I would like to push (in no particular order):  - Simplify scalarizer API and usage,  - Create internal APIs (basically split gfortran.h and/or

Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-28 Thread Mikael Morin
Hello, I would like to apply for 60% of my work time if there is funding for it. These are the projects that I would like to push (in no particular order): - Simplify scalarizer API and usage, - Create internal APIs (basically split gfortran.h and/or trans.h to different pieces) and add unit

Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-28 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
Hi everybody, there is also another aspect. Could this Sovereign Tech Fund also include travel allowances to go to a GNU Cauldron or a WG5 meeting? This could be quite interesting, I think. What is the largest number of gfortran contributers who ever met in one place? Manchester, a few years a

Re: Possible funding of gfortran work

2023-05-28 Thread Nicolas König
Hi everyone, I think I can offer to pick up the work again. There were some strange details about pointers and coarrays which had me thinking that the approach taken for the native coarrays was doomed to failure (which is why I didn't continue the work), but I now think that the Fortran standard