[PATCH] Fix fc-prototypes usage with C_INT64_T and non LP64 Targets.

2023-03-29 Thread Andrew Pinski via Fortran
The problem here is we were outputing long_long instead of "long long". This was just an oversight and a missing check. Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * dump-parse-tree.cc (get_c_type_name): Fix "long_long" type name to be

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR87477 - [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

2023-03-29 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran
Hi Manfred, Indeed I do :-) Thanks for the spot. I have decided that it will be less messy if I roll all the testcases into one or, perhaps two => associate_xx.f90 Forgetting the space before the final brace seems to be rife! Cheers Paul On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 09:24, Manfred Schwarb wrote:

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR87477 - [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

2023-03-29 Thread Manfred Schwarb via Fortran
Am 28.03.23 um 23:04 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran: > Hi All, > > I have made a start on ASSOCIATE issues. Some of the low(-ish) hanging > fruit are already fixed but I have yet to check that they a really fixed > and to close them: > pr102106, pr102111, pr104430, pr106048, pr85510, pr874