Pushed, thanks for feedback
On 2/26/23 11:54 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Just side remarks, the 0 init in the patch is fine.
On 27.02.23 03:53, Jerry D via Gcc-patches wrote:
regarding PACK: since this is a bogus warning as the compiler does
not realize that dim >= 1, wouldn't a
gcc_assert (dim
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:54:38PM +0100, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
>
> as found by the reporter, the result of the intrinsic IBITS
> differed from other compilers (e.g. Intel, NAG) for the corner
> case that the LEN argument was equal to BIT_SIZE(I), which is
> explicitly allowed by the st
Dear all,
as found by the reporter, the result of the intrinsic IBITS
differed from other compilers (e.g. Intel, NAG) for the corner
case that the LEN argument was equal to BIT_SIZE(I), which is
explicitly allowed by the standard.
We actually had an inconsistency for this case between
code genera
And another re-diff for GCC 13/mainline, updating gcc/testsuite/
(The last change is related to the "[OG12,committed] Update dg-dump-scan
for ..." discussion + OG12 https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4de87a2309 /
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/612871.html )
On 23.02.23 17:42, Tobias
Hi Thomas,
On 25.02.23 10:11, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Do to the scan patterns need adjusting, or is something wrong?
The former. Regarding:
* gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f - for 'acc exit data':
!$ACC EXIT DATA FINALIZE DELETE (del_f_p(2:5))
Here, 'map\\(to:del_f_p [pointer set]' chang
