Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

2023-01-31 Thread Steve Kargl via Fortran
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:38:02PM +0800, LIU Hao wrote: > 在 2023-01-31 21:13, Thomas Schwinge 写道: > > Hi! > > > > On 2023-01-30T14:50:08-0800, Steve Kargl via Fortran > > wrote: > > > Does the skull and crossbones convey anymore info than the rest of > > > the subject line > > > > > > Bui

Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

2023-01-31 Thread LIU Hao via Fortran
在 2023-01-31 21:13, Thomas Schwinge 写道: Hi! On 2023-01-30T14:50:08-0800, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote: Does the skull and crossbones convey anymore info than the rest of the subject line Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master) They convey as much additional i

Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

2023-01-31 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2023-01-30T14:50:08-0800, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote: > Does the skull and crossbones convey anymore info than the rest of > the subject line > > Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master) They convey as much additional information as does (automated) colorfu

Re: [Patch] Fortran: Extend align-clause checks of OpenMP's allocate clause

2023-01-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:38:22PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > I missed that 'align' needs to be a power of 2 - contrary to 'aligned', > which does not have this restriction for some odd reason. Yeah, odd. The C and C++ FEs indeed diagnose non-pow2p constants for align (and not for aligned clau

Re: [Patch][v2] OpenMP/Fortran: Partially fix non-rect loop nests [PR107424]

2023-01-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > updated patch included, i.e. avoiding 'count' for 'j' when a 'j.0' would > do (i.e. only local var without the different step calculation). I also > now reject if there is a non-unit step on the loop using an outer var. > > Eventuall

Re: [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Fix loop-iter var privatization with !$OMP LOOP [PR108512]

2023-01-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Fortran
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: > > PR fortran/108512 > * openmp.cc (gfc_resolve_omp_do_blocks): Don't check 'inscan' > restrictions for loop as rejected elsewhere. > (gfc_resolve_do_iterator): Set a source location fo